Tutorial Upgrade: facebook

Monday, July 18, 2016

Facebook launches Sports Stadium hub for you to chat about the big game

Popularly, you will agree with me that Twitter is the commonest community for people to generally liveblog their thoughts as regards a sporting events. Consequently, Facebook is making a bold move to build kingdoms in the sports market; possibly earning a solid stake there. The social network is launching the Facebook Sports Stadium, a specialized section of Facebook designated to the purpose of serving as a central hub to accommodate all your second-screen activity.

Facebook launches Sports Stadium hub for you to chat about the big game

Prospective persons who employ the services of Facebook Sports Stadium will have the ability to switch between four tabs. Play-by-play details in the mould of those you see on ESPN’s site and apps will be shown by one of these shows , another will gather important comments from your friends, in an orderly arrangement of most recent first — sharing the manner of Twitter’s. A third tab reveals comments from “experts” — certified commentators, players, as well as other notable names — then the last one will bring in detailed stats for the event you’re watching.

.
The only exception to all it could have is the game itself — Facebook will only license provision of game data from a company with the name of Sportradar, which Facebook prefers to partnering with the major sports networks.

Quite contrastingly, Facebook’s Dan Reed disclosed to the public that the new hub was a big spice to the television experience. “It provides information about the game, but it also provides you that vital conversation and interaction around the game which we think is really critical to consuming live sports.”

“We think it can really enhance awareness,” Kafka said. “Maybe you weren’t paying attention and then you see your friends are having this discussion and that can pull you into the game. We think that’s a win-win for everybody. It drives more eyeballs to what [our content partners] are already sharing.”

Facebook Sports Stadium:

Today we’re launching the Facebook Sports Stadium, a dedicated place to experience sports in real-time with your friends and the world. Check out our product announcement here: http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/01/facebook-sports-stadium With 650 million sports fans, Facebook is the world’s largest stadium. People already turn to Facebook to celebrate, commiserate, and talk trash with their friends and other fans.Now we’ve built a place devoted to sports so you can get the feeling you’re watching the game with your friends even when you aren’t together.

Posted by Sports on Facebook on Wednesday, 20 January 2016

By dedicating a section to big game discussion into its own area, Facebook may now provide an improved and enhanced medium to seeing your friends having a discussion.”

The hub has been rolled out already now being available for iPhone users who watch football games the US, as Facebook announced it will be extending the service so as to encompass other sports as well as other countries soonest.

Get

Facebook has taken down the post of journalist Ed Lingao Anti Marcos sentiment

ANTI-MARCOS SENTIMENT against the burial of former President Ferdinand Marcos.
Facebook has taken down a television anchors post critical of plans to allow the burial of dictator Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes Cemetery), supposedly because the post violated the social networks community standards.

Lingao said that it was the second time his post was removed.
For the third time on Wednesday, he posted the same post, which Facebook earlier deleted.

In his post, Lingao questioned the decision of President-elect Rodrigo Duterte to allow the burial of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

Duterte has said that burying Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani would allow the healing of the nation, which he said has been long divided by the said issue.

But Lingao justified why the former president should not be buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani, citing his human rights abuses and ill-gotten wealth.

“YOU WANT him buried at the Libingan ng mga Bayani? Very well, but on the headstone, put the name William Saunders. That is the name he used to open his first Swiss account, that later mushroomed to a dozen,” his post read.

During the Marcos regime, he said tens of thousands were victims of human rights abuses and at least $10 billion were been stolen by the Marcos family.

“So really, who should move on and allow healing? The thousands who were victimized? The prosecutors still looking for another five billion dollars in hidden wealth? Or a family that chooses to ignore all this by funding a macabre quarter-century spectacle at the family mausoleum in Ilocos because it simply insists that the patriarch be buried a hero. Who is really holding the nation hostage here? And so, really, who should move on?” Lingao said.

He said the issue of burying Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani is a moral issue.

“The rules governing the use of the Libingan are just executive in nature, and the commander-in-chief can of course order that the rules be changed. It is not a legal question at all, but a moral one,” he said.

After his third post, Lingao said he was barred from posting any status for one day.

Lingao said Facebook’s action of taking down his post was “ridiculous.”

“It was really ridiculous. Anyone who has read the post can tell you that it was quite subdued. I think the points were also reasonably argued,” he said.

“I find it alarming that Facebook’s community standards do not appear to be well thought out,” he added.

He said he was wondering whether Facebook “makes decisions like these based only on the number of complaints, in which case the group with the most number of trolls can control FB content.”

Aside from Lingao, other journalists’ Facebook accounts were suspended after sharing his post.

Lingao also said that a follow-up post on his account, where he described the comments he received on the original post, was also deleted.

On Wednesday afternoon, Lingao reposted the first post. But he has since been blocked from making further posts on his Facebook account for at least 24 hours.

Meanwhile, journalist Inday Espina-Varona said that her brother, Nonoy Espina, and other colleagues from media also found their Facebook accounts suspended after sharing Lingaos post. Link Post

Sought for comment, Facebook said it is now looking into the matter.

“We are looking into this now,” said Ken Teh, Facebook media partnerships in the Asia Pacific region.

According to Facebooks community standards, the following kinds of posts are not allowed on the social network, and may be removed by site administrators: hate speech, violence and graphic content, nudity, bullying and harassment, direct threats, attacks on public figures, criminal activity, sexual violence and exploitation, dangerous organizations, regulated goods, and self-injury, among others.

Content reviewers look over posts reported for violating community standards.

The site, however, said that the number of reports on a particular post "does not impact whether something will be removed," and added that it does not remove content "simply because it has been reported a number of times."

If you remember U.S. Internet giants Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc., Google and Microsoft Corp. pledged to tackle online hate speech in less than 24 hours as part of a joint commitment with the European Union to combat the use of social media by terrorists. (Tuesday Post May 31)

Your can read my post : Giant Social Media Vow to Tackle Online Hate Speech Within 24 Hours

Get

Tutorial Upgrade

Pages

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

download social media for your iphone 3g and 3gs os version 4 1 facebook twitter instagram yahoo messenger ect

Monday, July 18, 2016

Facebook launches Sports Stadium hub for you to chat about the big game

Facebook has taken down the post of journalist Ed Lingao Anti Marcos sentiment